The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990.
The circular chart, illustrate about the four causes of the land degradation, and the tabular chart raveals about the affected degrated land in three regions during the year 1990. The data is calculated in the percentum.
It is clearly seen from the given pie chart that , about 28 percent of the land was degrated due to the cause of over cultivation during the year 1990.
Firstly, we can seen that, 30 percent of the land was degrated due to the deforestation. Furthermore, the highest number of land was degrated due to overgrazing i.e 35 percent , and at last, only 7 percent of the land was degrated due to the other reasons.
Secondly, in the given tabular chart, it is seen that during the year 1990, in America, 5 percent of the total land was degraded due to the deforestation, over-cultivation and over-grazing with the ratio 0.2:3.3:1.5 . Moreover , the highest land was degraded in Europe with total 23 percent and the ratio of their causes are 9.8:7.7:5.5 . At the last in Oceania, about 13 percent of the total land was degraded with the ratio 1.7:0:11.3 respectively.
Overall, it is evident that , overgrazing activity is the main cause of the land degradation as compare to the other two causes especially in Europe region during 1990
- Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world. However these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science, technology and business.what do you think that is? What could be done to encourage more peo 84
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, california and the rest of the worldwide. 56
- The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 11
- The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 78
- Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world. However these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science, technology and business.what do you think that is? What could be done to encourage more peo 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The circular chart, illustrate about the...
^^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...early seen from the given pie chart that , about 28 percent of the land was degrat...
^^
Line 6, column 17, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'see' or 'be seen'?
Suggestion: see; be seen
...uring the year 1990. Firstly, we can seen that, 30 percent of the land was degrat...
^^^^
Line 6, column 176, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...grated due to overgrazing i.e 35 percent , and at last, only 7 percent of the land...
^^
Line 8, column 216, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... over-grazing with the ratio 0.2:3.3:1.5 . Moreover , the highest land was degrade...
^^
Line 8, column 227, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng with the ratio 0.2:3.3:1.5 . Moreover , the highest land was degraded in Europe...
^^
Line 8, column 337, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...he ratio of their causes are 9.8:7.7:5.5 . At the last in Oceania, about 13 percen...
^^
Line 10, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ectively. Overall, it is evident that , overgrazing activity is the main cause ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92018779343 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8539068492 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446009389671 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4750274399 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.444444444 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185878337682 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953479082383 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083021286042 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142976129781 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724381040598 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.