The pie chart and the table illustrate how British visitors distribute to 4 different types of tourist destination in 1999 according to a survey.
Overall, following the pie chart, tourists tent to unwind in theme parks as well as contemplating artefacts in museums and galleries.
To be more specific, the table presents that in theme parks, visitors were mostly attracted by Blackpool Pleasure Beach rather than other sections.
Firstly, according to the pie chart, people who chose to engage in amusing activities in theme parks and museums & exhibitions account for the highest proportion, at about 38% and 37%. The figure decreases when it comes to historic houses & monuments as well as wildlife parks & zoos visiting which contributed 16% and 9% respectively.
Secondly, turning to the table, tourists in British theme parks were prone to entertaining on a beach called "Blackpool Pleasure" (at 47 per cent of the total number). Other attractions in the theme parks such as Alton towers and Pleasureland in Southport welcomed approximately 17% and 16% of the visitors whereas the figure decline to ten per cent when it comes to both Chessington World of Adventure and Legoland in Windsor.
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 73
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 73
- More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation Describe some of the problems over reliance on can come and suggest at least one possible solution 89
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 92
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27604166667 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04107320411 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614583333333 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.7558877683 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.714285714 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 5.23603664747 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328393945752 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140927801158 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595665091195 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172058317882 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485876566628 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27604166667 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04107320411 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614583333333 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.7558877683 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.714285714 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 5.23603664747 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328393945752 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140927801158 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595665091195 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172058317882 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485876566628 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.