The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world
Given are charts illustrating how water is distributed to separated regions for three purposes.
Overall, a more detailed look at pictures reveals that water using for residential aim is the highest while that for agricuture accounts for the smallest percentage in San Diego and California and vice versa for the globe. The utilization of industrial water maintains the second rank in all three areas.
In San Diego and California, the consumption of residential water makes up three-fifths and two-fifths of the total water intake. In comparison to two mentioned nations, that of worldwide is just under 10%. By contrast, farmers consume more than a half (69%) in the rest of the world, but only 17% and 28% water usage in San Diego and California respectively.
Regarding of industry aim, the figures are not such dramatic differences. To be more detailed, the same proportion in San Diego and Worldwide is 23% while that in California is 10% higher, at 33%. Compared to the former, the latter allocates water more equally among these fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | zee7 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | Mabel Nguyenn | 67 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 10
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots 63
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 84
- The global demand for oil and gas is increasing Some believe that we should therefore encourage the exploitation of remote areas Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 98
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st, farmers consume more than a half 69% in the rest of the world, but only 17% ...
^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 69% in the rest of the world, but only 17% and 28% water usage in San Diego and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13953488372 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86886646744 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8591509777 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2222222222 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332519353322 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117550049612 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100233759401 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177031660064 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898456895411 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.