The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, california and the rest of the world
The circular chart reveals the information about the utilization of water by the San Diego, california and the worldwide. The data is calibrated in percentum. It is clearly and coherently representated.
Firstly, we can seen that in the chart, usage of water divided into three main categories. It have been notice that 60% demand of water by the residents and 17% in industry as well as 23% in agriculture in San Diego country. After that, in california approximately 39% residents usage of water, but in industry and agriculture use of water is 33% and 28% respectively. Similarly, either industry or residents water utilise with the ratio of 23:8 percent, whereas 8% consumption of water in the agriculture in all over the world.
Overall, it is evident that only in california utilisation of water at the same average in all categories.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | zee7 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | Mabel Nguyenn | 67 | view |
- Some people believe they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state Do you agree or disagree 56
- Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world. However these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science, technology and business.what do you think that is? What could be done to encourage more peo 84
- Nowdays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Why do you think it is happening? Is it a negative or positive development? 56
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, california and rest of the worldwide. 56
- Some people say that computer games are bad for childern by all means their believe that these games are contributing to childern development.Now discuss other views and opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'see' or 'be seen'?
Suggestion: see; be seen
...ently representated. Firstly, we can seen that in the chart, usage of water divid...
^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
... divided into three main categories. It have been notice that 60% demand of water by...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, similarly, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 707.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08103977943 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578571428571 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.161705077 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.375 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313166591532 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122089056107 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898581647975 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194254589766 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667680149651 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.