The pie charts below give information about the composition of household rubbish in the United Kingdom in two different years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These two pie charts illustrate the data about the composition of household trash for the United Kingdom in 2 different years: 1985 and 2002. There are 8 categories, based on different types of rubbish.
On the first pie chart, it shows that 36% of trash is paper in 1985. The second biggest segment is kitchen/organic waste at 28%. The rest parts are: both metals and wood at 8% and glass with plastic make up 14% in total. The smallest part is dust and cinders at 5%.
In the second pie chart, dust and cinders are replaced with miscellaneous. There are about 16% of paper followed by 44% of kitchen/organic waste in 2002. 17% of chart belongs to miscellaneous, plastic and wood at 7 and 6% respectively. To give a glance at small parts, it can be seen, that both metals and glass make up 8% in sum. Textiles have the smallest proportion, at just 2%.
As an overall trend, while the percentage for the majority types of rubbish falls, the kitchen/organic waste rises.
- The pie chart gives information on UAE government spending in 2000. The total budget was AED 315 billion.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds ofmeat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 73
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view. 67
- The Internet has caused people to be isolated from their real lives.Do you agree or disagree? 70
- Today, more and more people choose to live by themselves. What are the causes of this? Is this a positive or negative development? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...lass with plastic make up 14% in total. The smallest part is dust and cinders at 5%...
^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...falls, the kitchen/organic waste rises.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67052023121 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8323699422 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595375722543 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5877739238 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.3333333333 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.4166666667 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176087826005 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627665695374 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829951214591 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121638539848 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118857897087 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.21 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.