The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
The charts illustrate how much money did household spend on the five different categories in the Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
Overall, It is viewed that, other goods and services accounted for the largest proportion in Japan but housing occupied the largest percentage in Malaysia. However, both countries spent lesser amount on health care.
To begin, Japanese household spent almost a quarter on housing while in Malaysia, housing stood at 34% and recorded as the majority proportion. Then, household expend approximately 29% on other goods and services in japan whereas in Malaysia, other goods and services laid at just above a quarter. Subsequently, Japanese household made 20% on transport but in Malaysia, household spent a half of Japan.
Household spent almost equal amount on food in Japan and Malaysia, subjected for 24% and 27% respectively. As can be seen, there was a mere minority on health care in both countries under 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-18 | vuongthaolinh | 85 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | huongab123 | view | |
| 2023-06-19 | mykhanh | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | saminhsn | view | |
| 2023-01-14 | Kaito Mori | view |
- The trend of on line shopping is increasing significantly What effect does it have on the environment and society in general 71
- Some parents believe that reading entertainment book is a waste of time In there opinion children should only read serious educational books Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experiences 41
- Some people think that government should invest in arts and cultural events. Others think that government should invest money on more important things. 78
- The gap between rich and poor is growing. What problems does this create? What can be done to tackle them.It is undeniable that a remarkable difference is enormously increasing between the lifestyles of rich and poor class of people.It has created a lot o 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24342105263 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77072116526 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8921522478 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.625 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233962235305 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108008621439 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852173865667 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150048350533 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736372000631 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.