The circle charts illustrate the amount of electricity generated from various fuel resources in two countries between 1980 and 2000.
It can be clearly seen that the generated units were also increased in Australia and France despite the importance of natural gas was decreased. Overall, one interesting fact was that the development of nuclear power was only applied in France.
In 1980, the total electricity generation from the two countries was almost 100 and 90 units for Australia and France, where the largest component came from coal at 50 and 25 units independently. The significance of natural gas was the same vital as coal in France while the contribution was lower with hydro power at 20 units in Australia. As far as the least generation in Australia and France, there were oil and hydro power at 10 and 5 units separately.
Over 20 years, the distribution of total production changed dramatically. As for total production, the generation in Australia rose to 170 units as well as an increase was realized in France by 90 units. Coal generation was still the biggest, which raised to 130 units sharply, although produced units remained unchanged in France. Also, the generated Hydropower was increased to 36 units in Australia whereas there were just 2 units produced with Natural gas in France. Moreover, Nuclear power became the most popular in France at 126 units suddenly. Lastly, oil and coal were fell to 2 units individually as well as be the least in Australia.
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- the graph show relative price changes for fresh fruit and vegetable, sugar and sweets, and carbonated drink between 1979 and 2009. 11
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 61
- in spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.why is this the case?what can be done about this problem? 73
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, moreover, so, still, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00403225806 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83611673641 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495967741935 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.087012776 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.416666667 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239486641058 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100091446793 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506535395645 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160937248773 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521279756249 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.