The plans below show the layout of the ground floor of a museum in 1990 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given maps illustrate some changes in the floor plans of a trade conference in two different years, 2009 and 2010.
Overall, there are plenty of considerable changes during two years mentioned, however, the most noticeable difference between two maps is that the location of meeting room and concert hall became the area for exhibition in 2010.
As can be seen from the map, the main entrance, registration and side entrance were completely unchanged. Whereas, the concert hall was relocated from the left to the right, next to the balcony, and there was a disappearance of the display area and meeting room in the left corner.
Turining to the other side of the floor, we can see that people added to the balcony a louge area and a registration were built next to it. Meanwhile, the exhibition area was extended and moved to the left corner, on the original site of meeting room and concert hall.

Votes
Average: 5 (6 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8141025641 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6314473435 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5428159319 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.166666667 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0548600622362 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031275393228 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344408761166 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0413819564358 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353381615042 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.