the production of electricity from different sources in 4 nations
The pie chart compares the production of electricity from different sources of energy in 4 nations in two years 2003 and 2008.
Overall, there are only figures for electricity from hydro power and fossil fuel in Morocco and Vietnam. Additionally, the electricity originated from hydro power made up the highest proportion in Sweden.
It is clear that 95% of the electricity produced from water in Morocco compared to 44% in Vietnam. By contrast, the figure for the electricity from fossil fuel in Vietnam was over ten times higher compared to that in Morocco, at 56% and 5% respectively.
Turning to the remaining, the percentage of electricity came from fossil fuel in India accounted for 82%, which was the highest figure in four countries compared to only 4% in Sweden. At the same time, the proportion of electricity made from water in Sweden was over three times higher compared to that in India. Finally, the figure for nuclear electricity took up 44% while this proportion in India was only at 4%.
- Education for young people is important in many countries. However, the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who can not read and write.To what extent do you agree or disagree? -2 67
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What are the solutions 78
- More and more students are choosing to study at colleges and universities in foreign countries.Do the benefits of studying abroad outweigh the drawbacks? 78
- Energy produced from 4 countries 73
- In some countries secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects In others children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today s world 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80473372781 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68796711029 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532544378698 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9557204694 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.2222222222 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198293359707 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998953198557 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167573833899 0.0843802449381 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194414789916 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.2137604911 0.0819641961636 261% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.