the production of electricity from different sources in 4 nations
The pie chart compares the production of electricity from different sources of energy in 4 nations in two years 2003 and 2008.
Overall, there are only figures for electricity from hydro power and fossil fuel in Morocco and Vietnam. Additionally, the electricity originated from hydro power made up the highest proportion in Sweden.
It is clear that 95% of the electricity produced from water in Morocco compared to 44% in Vietnam. By contrast, the figure for the electricity from fossil fuel in Vietnam was over ten times higher compared to that in Morocco, at 56% and 5% respectively.
Turning to the remaining, the percentage of electricity came from fossil fuel in India accounted for 82%, which was the highest figure in four countries compared to only 4% in Sweden. At the same time, the proportion of electricity made from water in Sweden was over three times higher compared to that in India. Finally, the figure for nuclear electricity took up 44% while this proportion in India was only at 4%.
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some to tourist facilities. 84
- It is suggested that everyone should have a car, a TV and a fridge.Do the advantages of this development for society outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about dangers of committing a crime. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- percentage of students proficient in a foreign language in different countries in 2000 73
- Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people s behavior What is your opinion 10
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80473372781 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68796711029 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532544378698 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9557204694 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.2222222222 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198293359707 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998953198557 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167573833899 0.0843802449381 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194414789916 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.2137604911 0.0819641961636 261% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.