Question:
The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city center from 2003-2012.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the provided line graph reveals the trends of three various types of convictions in central Newport city over interval between 2003 and 2012.
Overall, it is evident that the number of burglary plummeted over the period, whereas the others saw minor variation. In addition, the figure for robbery was smallest in the time surveyed.
It is apparent that from the given information that the number of burglary rose sharply before reaching at peak in 2004, to roughly 3800 incidents. The subsequent 4 years, however, witnessed a tremendous decline of this figure, reaching its lowest point of practically 1100 cases. On the other hand, the figures for car-theft and robbery saw the resembled trend, rising to some points before dropping slightly. It is interesting to note that after 2007, car-theft officially became the most lawbreaking cases in the downtown of Newport, practically 2300 incidents.
In somewhere at 2008, the figure for burglary recovered from its bottom, which is preceded by minor fluctuations. Likewise, the data of robbery remained at similar rate before finishing at roughly 600. Car-theft, in contrast, witnessed a gradual growth, finishing at somewhere above 2500 incidents, which is almost the same with its starting point.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, so, whereas, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.355 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72832824272 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.896282271 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.1 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0569719088383 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0224264805512 0.103423049105 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037375883951 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0422910975788 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482763781875 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.