The bar chart compares the percentage of people using the Internet in four different places between 1998 and 2004.
Overall, home and library saw upward trends in the proportion of Internet users, while the contrasting trends happened to the other two locations. Specially, home was the most favourite place for those who connected to the Internet during the period.
In 1998, about 53% of people using the Internet at home, which was more five times than that of library. These two figures all fluctuated throughout the years shown. In detail, in 2000, the percentage of users connecting to the Internet at home decreased by around 5% before gradually increasing and reaching the peak of approximately 55% in 2004. The figure for library rose marginally to about 15% in 2000 before slightly dropping to roughly 13% in the end of the period.
In terms of work and college, in 1998 the proportions of people using the Internet were nearly 30% and 20%, respectively. However, after 6 years, work became the place that least people accessed to the Internet, at just 10%, whereas the figure for college was higher , at around 18%.
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 73
- The pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made 84
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- the graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children
- the graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hereas the figure for college was higher , at around 18%.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95263157895 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5699287669 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584210526316 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5805646318 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.555555556 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253129009835 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103665613115 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708357661667 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161308695067 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468886732258 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.