The bar chart demonstrates the experiment recorded the access to the Internet by a resident area between 1998 and 2004. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the usage rationales for the various parts of places to accessing social media, though less noticeable when coming from the library. Meanwhile, accommodation is the most crucial concern for almost the public during the whole period.
In 1998, the rate of people using the Internet at home started at over 50, however, the disparity regarding looking at the figure in 2000 was worse ( approximately 45%). In the next 4 years, there is steadily considerable growth of homes and reach a peak at 55% in 2004. In contrast, accessing the Internet with library equipment is less typical, it follow upward trend in the first year and end the period by just under 15%.
People accessing Internet in work and college details staying stable. Both figures remain the number of users to under 30% for the former and 20% for the later in 2 years. In 2002, while the percentage of college proceed with 20%, People for the same purpose in Work decline marginally. In the of period, user in work plunged to just over 10% and following this trend, available resident in college accessing to Internet also go down gentlier.
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain 61
- With the development of social media more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to the Internet What potential problems may this trend lead to What solutions can you suggest to deal with it 89
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 84
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... looking at the figure in 2000 was worse approximately 45%. In the next 4 years, ...
^^
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... homes and reach a peak at 55% in 2004. In contrast, accessing the Internet with l...
^^
Line 2, column 348, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'follows'?
Suggestion: follows
...h library equipment is less typical, it follow upward trend in the first year and end ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sing to Internet also go down gentlier.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, look, regarding, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88584474886 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57416016127 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616438356164 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2188124475 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292164078831 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105380439518 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549523857019 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184912206343 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056871898092 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.