The Table and the Bar chart below give information about travelling to work in Houston Texas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

We are provided with two graphs, one of them a table, shows how commuting to work with different forms of transport in Houston, Texas. The other one, bar chart, illustrates the amount of CO2 which is emitted from the means of transport showed in Table.

Looking in more detail, it can be seen that the most common modes of transport is car which is driven alone, at 48 percent. The second most popular modes of transport, referred public transport, are train and bus, 37 percent. On the other hand, cyclists and walkers allocate the least percentage to themselves by 15 percent.

the highest average age of people who travel by pubic transport is 47 years old. However, 39 percent of travelers include the lowest average age related to those who cycle or walk.

By comparison, cars which are driven alone cause the most pollution due to producing carbon dioxides about 0.032 kilograms, while cars with passengers produce approximately 0.08 kilograms of CO2. Interestingly, just 0.01 kilograms is emitted from public transport. Not surprisingly, cyclists and pedestrians produce no pollution.

Overall, we can conclude that although cars with drivers only are the most popular means of transport to work, they cause more pollution than all the rest.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (30 votes)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...centage to themselves by 15 percent. the highest average age of people who trave...
^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: PUBIC_X[1]
Message: Did you mean 'public'?
Suggestion: public
...est average age of people who travel by pubic transport is 47 years old. However, 39 ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1213592233 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67004853972 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640776699029 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0719648591 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9090909091 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0657614986284 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0240078602708 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257620953609 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0365673353313 0.15604864568 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029227452461 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

The table illustrates how the citizens in Houston, Texas commuted to work, and the bar chart delineates the travel problem they experience.
Looking from an overall perspective, the majority of people use cars, which is also the factor causing the most pollution. While the proportion of commuters riding bicycle or walking is the lowest, it is environmentally friendly. However, most of young people choose to walk or cycle, whilst the average age of resident commuting by bus or train is the highest.
Looking at the table more closely, one can see that 48 percent of citizens commuting to work by personal car and 11 percent of citizens going to work by sharing the car, making the car is the most popular form of means of conveyance in Houston. Although the proportion of people using the train or bus is second largest after the rate of people using a private car to work at 37%, it is a transportation solution with the highest average age of passengers at 47 years old, it is older than the average of residents using the private car and the sharing car 4 years old (43 years old) and 3 years old (44 years old) respectively. Nevertheless, just 4 percent of people commuting to work by bicycle or walk, but most people who choose this solution are young people, which is evidenced by the mean youngest age at 39 years old.
According to the bar chart, it is apparent that around 0.32 kilograms per person per kilometer of carbon dioxide emissions for commute alone by car, it is the witness that this is the most polluting way. While citizens traveling to work by the sharing car produce carbon dioxide is approximately 0.08 kilograms per person per kilometer, those using public transport product about 0.01 kilograms per person per kilometer. Only people commuting by bicycle or walking do not contribute to environmental pollution when absolutely no carbon dioxide emissions are released.