The table shows the number of students who did research in Australian universities, and the pie charts compare the proportion of these students by gender. The figures were given for 2001 and 2010.
Overall, the number of Australian research students increased significantly over the given period. Besides, the figure for local students is always higher than that for international ones.
In 2001, the majority of students carrying out research in Australia were local (33,657) compared to only 5,192 students from outside the country. By 2010, the number of local students had risen to nearly 40,000, and international research students had also witnessed a nearly three-fold increase in its population, to 54,081 to be specific.
Regarding gender distribution, the proportion of local male students was equal to that of females, at 43% for each, while there was a disparity in gender among students from other countries, with the figure for females (9%) being more than twice as high as that for males (4%). Over the following ten years, female local students outnumbered their male counterparts, with the percentage of the former being 4% higher. However, in the international group, the figure for females was slightly lower than that for males.
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 92
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future. 67
- The table and pie chart shows the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 84
- Today, many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports. why is it? Is it a positive or negative development? 89
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('nearly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('three-fold') instead of another adjective.
...al research students had also witnessed a nearly three-fold increase in its population, to 54,081 t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s population, to 54,081 to be specific. Regarding gender distribution, the propo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29145728643 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79209835734 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557788944724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7456365004 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172166634069 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895806367734 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782460749215 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142355304089 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916430692713 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.