The table shows the average percentage of money that college students of 3 countries spending each year on 5 different categories.
Overall, it is clear that students in country A and B have larger annual expenditure and they spend most of their money on accomodation.
The total spending of students in country A is highest, at $5000 per year, following by students in country B and C who spend $4500 and $1500 per year respectively. In term of accomodation, students in country A and B spend the largest percentage of money on it, accounting for 45% and 35% respectively. This figure in country C is only 30%. Food accounts for the largest amount of money of students in country C, at 36% while students in country A and B spend 22% andh 28% on food respectively.
In country A and B, students spend same proportion of money on leisure (22-23%) whereas, students in country C spend only 12% of their expenditure on it. In contrast, the average percentage of money spent on book of students in country C is 21%, higher than that of students in country A and B which are only 3% and 9% respectively. Students in all countries spend less than 10% of annual expenditure on other activities.
- Some people say thai too much attetion and resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 85
- The graph shows oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010. 56
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by seclecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
- These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time Explain why you think this change has happened What are the effects of this change in attitude 92
- The chart shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61137440758 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95086024745 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440758293839 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2366456644 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33470779583 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179802312697 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599733012916 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244698927032 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504280319483 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.