The table denotes the conversion in the way of travelling by British people in a period of 15 years, through various modes of travel including car, Taxi and other modes.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is apparent from the data provided that, people has been travelling more in 2000 based on the presented average distance travelled per person that has witnessed a dramatic increment from 4,740 miles in 1985to 6,475 in 2000 by divergent modes of travel. What is more, it is worthy to note that, the most popular vehicle that people has been picking it up through these years, is car that has earned the highest average distance in both 1985 and 2000.
As is statistically illustrated by the table the average distance that has been travelled by people, has seen a sharp drop using some travel modes. The most prominent one is the distance that has travelled by car which gone up from 3,199to 4,806 miles during a 15- year period.It is also feasible to mention other rapid growth in travelling by local bus along with train, which the average distance in both of them has raised from 429 to 274 miles besides 289 to 366 respectively.
On the strike contrast, as can be seen from the the information supplied by the table, the average distances travelled by people by some modes of travel has seen a marked deplete. The distance travelled by walking and riding a bike has fallen from 255 to 237 and 51 to 41 miles respectively, which are not really considerable changes, whereas travelling by bus lost its popularity based on the decline of average distance travelled, from 429 to 274 miles.
- The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main 84
- The Table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extend do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 78
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...to 4,806 miles during a 15- year period.It is also feasible to mention other rapid...
^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...he strike contrast, as can be seen from the the information supplied by the table, the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...he strike contrast, as can be seen from the the information supplied by the table, the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, look, really, so, whereas, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77419354839 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56649846114 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512544802867 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 401.4 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.0982571014 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 190.285714286 112.824112599 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.8571428571 22.9334400587 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131169380828 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771581047719 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361648539372 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920997851332 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170199081513 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.2329268293 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.