The table demonstrates the data of Australian and Malaysian inhabitants between 1980 to 2002.
Overall, it is apparently seen that Malaysia had younger people compared to Australia. Also, the birthrate of Malaysian citizens was relatively more than in Australia.
To commence with the total community, in the year 1980, in Australia there were about 14.7 million people recorded which increased by 5 million in the year of 2002. However, in Malaysia, people accounted for 13.7 million in 1980 which was almost double in the year 2002. In Australia, the male population remained unchanged in both years while, in Malaysia, it was inclined by 0.3% in the year 2002. Similarly, female citizens claimed for 50.1% in both years in Australia whereas, 49.7% and 49.4% in Malaysia in 1980 and 2002, respectively.
Moreover, the birthrate of Australian residents was nearly 1.5 % which was almost half of Malaysian habitants. The average yearly growth of Malaysian people approximately double that of Australian people and it was about 2.4% and 2.1% in 1980 and 2002. Moreover, the old aged ratio was comparatively high in Australia than in Malaysia and was about 9.6% and 12.4% in 1980 and 2002, respectively.
- Computer games are very popular for all ages and nationalities Parents think this has little educational value and it will be harmful for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The diagrams below show how chocolate is made and how the price of a chocolate bar is divided up among those involved in the process Summary the information by choosing and reporting the key features and make any relevant comparisons 46
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of households income distributed in different categories 85
- These days many people leave their country to work abroad and take their family with them Do you think benefits of this outweigh disadvantages in terms of family development
- The pie chart below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in UK in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, however, moreover, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20618556701 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84711926338 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494845360825 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6887616798 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181198663334 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890544893391 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329204483341 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112459158047 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327880022419 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.