The table below shows the information and prediction regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries.
The table illustrates the balanced of the population of elders in three European counties, in the year 1988, 2000 and 2030.
Overall, it is clear that in 1988, the elder population were least in percentage. However, in 2030 the prediction in a change of population rose rapidly.
At the beginning of the period, above aged population decreased in all three countries, Canada with 16.32%, Germany at 20.45%, and UK 14.23% respectively. Furthermore, in 2000, the percentage of the elder population were reported slightly steady with 20.67%, 25.32% in Germany and 14.89% in the UK.
At the end of the period, the age group made a tremendous change in 2030 with extremely balanced percentages, Germany made a huge change in digits with 30.42%. Nonetheless, Canada and the UK were gradually increased with 26.35% and 20.35%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-31 | vananhxh2005 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-26 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | view | |
| 2021-08-26 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | view | |
| 2021-08-26 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-20 | dinhthu05 | 100 | view |
- Many people nowadays travel aboard for their university education Why do people do this and will you consider doing this yourself 58
- More and more businesses, as well as individuals, are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather than being face to face.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating. 61
- The majority of news being reported is bad news such as wars, crimes, accidents, faminesWhy do you think that is?Do you think the news should be balanced with both good and bad news? 73
- The table below gives information on UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 68
- he charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groupsand the amount of support they received from employers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. • Yo 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, nonetheless
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 699.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 134.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21641791045 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.40232815919 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88296438179 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544776119403 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 197.1 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2327537779 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8571428571 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2042448184 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970057886183 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600253181415 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124746791266 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351402257279 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.