The given table compares car production in Argentina, Australia and Thailand in the years 2003,2006 and 2009.
Overall, it can be seen that the figures for car production experienced an upward trend across the board, except for Australia. In addition, Thailand was by far the most productive country in making cars.
In 2003, the figure for car production in Argentina was 235,000, which was two times lower than that of Australia, at ( 452,000). Meanwhile, Thailand’s car production was the highest in this year with 736,000. From 2003 to 2006, there was a gradual increase to 352,00 cars in Argentina whereas Australia experienced a slight decrease to 341,000 cars. The figure for cars manufactured in Thailand also reached a peak at 341,000.
By 2009, the number of cars produced in Argentina was 466,00, which was nearly double the corresponding data in Australia ( 245,000). In addition, the figure for automobile production cars in Thailand ended the period in 1st place with approximately 1,000,000 cars, despite a minimal drop by the end.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r production in Argentina, Australia and Thailand in the years 2003,2006 and 2009...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iland in the years 2003,2006 and 2009. Overall, it can be seen that the figures...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ost productive country in making cars. In 2003, the figure for car production i...
^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o times lower than that of Australia, at 452,000. Meanwhile, Thailand’s car produ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ailand also reached a peak at 341,000. By 2009, the number of cars produced in ...
^^^
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uble the corresponding data in Australia 245,000. In addition, the figure for aut...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20118343195 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85342107554 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585798816568 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.847761874 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117351011206 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670435572085 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494715282658 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996605891914 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526033530084 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.