The table illustrates the proportion of males and females who cycled in different age groups in a city in 2011. Overall, it is clear that the number of male cyclists is lower than female counterparts in all ranges of ages, whereas the figure for both genders between 18 and 39 was lower than the others.
Over half of girls from 0 to 9 years old cycled, which was 1% higher than that of boys, at 51,3% and 50,3% respectively. The percentage of teenage girls who cycled was approximately 2 times higher than that of boys who rode bikes in the next age group (10 – 17), at 42,2% and 24,6%.
The figure for the 18 – 30 and 40 - 59 saw a gradual decrease. In the former group, only 17,1% women cycled, compared to just under 10% of men. Between the ages of 40 to 59, the figures even fell further, to just above 12% for females and only 8 percentage for males. However, there was a significant increase in the final age class (60+), the proportion reached 18,5% for women compared with just approximately 13% for men.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The main purpose of a public library is to provide books, and they shouldn’t waste the limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, video, and DVDs.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statemen 73
- The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese islands 78
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43085106383 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45730600245 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601063829787 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4683417437 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.125 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155226864992 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756931987179 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930936452765 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106407091919 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333527949823 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.