The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u

The table represents an estimation of three environmental projects cost which is related to sustainable forestry and the pie chart illustrates the expenses of the different sectors of the first year to for the startup the projects.

Overall, what stands out from the table is that South-East Asia costs more money than all others every year, while West Africa is the least. On the other hand, in the first year, most money will be utilized on salaries.

To begin, in every project costs will decrease than the previous year which is 3 million for West Africa and 8 and 10 million for Central America and South-East Asia respectively. Last three years the expenditure will stand steadily at 5 million on the Central America project. In terms of West Africa the next two consecutive years the price will remain level off at 2.5 and then, it will increase by 1 million. In Southeast Asia, the third-year cost will upgrade 20 million and the rest of the time will remain at 50 million.

Turning to the pie chart, according to the data half of the money will go over giving salaries to the employees. Moreover, 30% will use to set up all materials, in addition, training and office expense will cost 20% of the total expenditure and 10% for each sector.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... money than all others every year, while West Africa is the least. On the other h...
^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, training and office expense will cost 20% of the total expenditure and 10% for...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, then, third, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75342465753 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53998691683 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566210045662 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6042811354 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279882184946 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130826993109 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974125860191 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18833052516 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10810541903 0.0819641961636 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.