The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table given here shows the amount of water used for three different purposes in six different nations in 2001. Overall, agriculture sector used huge amounts of water compared to other two industries in all the six countries.

In agriculture, Russia and Turkey used 1663 m3 and 1462 m3, which is the highest amount of water used on comparison with other nations. Canada ranked third with a utilisation of 1238 m3 of water, while the other three nations utilised water in farming to a lower extent with 810 m3 by Uk and the least usage of 605 m3 by China.

For domestic usage, Australia ranked first with 341m3 of utilisation followed by Canada with 279m3 of water usage. Russia and Turkey have used 98m3 and 80m3 of water for house hold work. The countries with least utilisation of water for domestic purpose are UK and China, with 38m3 and 26m3 of water utilisation.

In industrial sector, Turkey topped the chart with 731m3 of water usage, followed by 532m3 of usage by China. UK and Russia which have utilised 398 and 275m3 of water, while China and Russia utilised only 71 and 96m3 of water.

To conclude, Canada uses most of the water in Agriculture, while Australasia utilises it water for house hold purpose and Turkey uses most of the water in industrial areas.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...other nations. Canada ranked third with a utilisation of 1238 m3 of water, while ...
^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge, Australia ranked first with 341m3 of utilisation followed by Canada with 279m...
^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...ater for house hold work. The countries with least utilisation of water for domestic purpo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'waters'?
Suggestion: waters
...iculture, while Australasia utilises it water for house hold purpose and Turkey uses ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77578475336 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39886424359 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466367713004 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0482448817 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191197105284 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100715822335 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972086900113 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127399838565 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776499081031 0.0819641961636 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.