The table compares the percentages of market shares of the top laptop companies in the world for a period of two years.
It is clear that HP was the most popular manufacturer, followed by Dell in the years 2006 and 2007. By contrast, Fujitsu-Siemens had the least market share for the notebook computer, which was ranked sixth over the same period.
In 2006, HP achieved a dominant position in the world market, with 31.4% market share, and Dell was ranked second, at 16.6%. Acer had 11.6% market share, while Toshiba and Lenovo each took just under 7%. The least popular manufacturer compared to the other six companies was Fujitsu-Siemens, with 4.8 market share. The market proportion of other unknown brands stood at 22.8%.
Between 2006 and 2007, the only three brands, HP, Dell and Toshiba, saw a rise in the share between 1% and 4%. Acer and Lenovo lost 0.9% and 0.4% during the same period, respectively. Fujitsu-Siemens still had the lowest market share, at 2.3% in 2013. Other manufacturers lost their shares by 3.5% in the same year.
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 73
- The pie graphs below show the results of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participate. 61
- Many young people regularly change their jobs over the years.What are the reasons for this?Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities.Others,however,say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both views and give your own op 73
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world spends numerous government expenditures. This money should be use in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table compares the percentages of ma...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91620111732 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66878940303 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586592178771 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6217668935 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.0 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.81818181818 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25804566339 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106741983334 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431622502839 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170366216582 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164307597836 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.