The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units)
2005 Present 2025
Hamburgers 40 38 51
Fried Chicken 35 37 45
Salads 5 15 41
Fried Rice 6 9 9
Noodles 6 8 9
You should write at least 150 words.
The table illustrates, the average amount of junk food consumed by people is divided into 5 categories (Hamburgers, Fried Chicken, salads, Fried rice and Noodles) in Melbourne. It’s between the years of 2005 – 2025. The units are measured in numbers.
Overall, the junk foods eaten by people, where Hamburgers is on top of the list. Meanwhile, Both Fried rice as well as Noodles have least value. When it comes to Healthy food like salads, it is increasing rapidly from 2005 to 2025 year. Finally, Fried Chicken has stabilized having nearly equals the hamburgers.
In terms of Hamburgers and Fried Chicken, it is having Increasing Values Which both are nearly equal having 5 – 6 in all years (40 – 35). While Fried Rice and Noodles has least amount out of all, having 6 – 9 units. Meanwhile, the foods like Salads has stabilized value when comparing all other foods, Value like 5 – 41.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | phoaiphuthinh | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | arjnaga | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | ravitejacts | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | Võ Ngọc Trang Thanh | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-19 | vijayvj1 | 56 | view |
- The dangers of smoking are well known, yet many people continue with this habit.What are the causes of this? How can we reduce smoking in society?Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 56
- The dangers of smoking are well known, yet many people continue with this habit.What are the causes of this? How can we reduce smoking in society?Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne units 2005 Pres 69
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...of the list. Meanwhile, Both Fried rice as well as Noodles have least value. When it comes...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the least'.
Suggestion: have the least
...ile, Both Fried rice as well as Noodles have least value. When it comes to Healthy food li...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the least'.
Suggestion: has the least
...s 40 – 35. While Fried Rice and Noodles has least amount out of all, having 6 – 9 units. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 746.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81290322581 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49269484202 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574193548387 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0730582811 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.6 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104492394013 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455131801892 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049835445319 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853558576168 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394471349391 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.