The table below depicts figures for factories and employees in the silk industry for England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
Based on the table, the number of silk factories in this region increased during this period, while the population of their employees decreased at the same time.
In 1851, 272 silk companies existed in these countries, whereas the statistics represent a sharp rise starting from this year until 1861. Although fluctuations can be observed through the next years, there was not a noticeable change till 1901, the data always stayed higher than 623 factories, which belongs to the end of the interval.
Despite this increase in the number of factories, the amount of their recruitment fell from 130,750 to 38,942 person by 1901, which means that the rate of employment by each factory declined dramatically from almost 500 employees per factory to about 70. Moreover, even though men were always accounted for the majority of the workforce, their percentage reduced from roughly 60 percent to nearly 67 percent over the course of this study.
- Argument Topic The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced 58
- A tendency that the news reported in the media focuses on problems and emergencies rather than the positive developments is harmful to both the individual and the society. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- One of your friends is going to visit your city for a short period. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter, you should:• tell him what time of the year is most suitable for sightseeing around the city• describe some places that are worth visiti 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13714285714 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51785460993 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668571428571 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.5647665997 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.833333333 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259583016452 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131109487571 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129456150451 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178333172869 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127905256946 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.