The assigned table contrasts the proportion of a series of travel transportations in Canada, Belgium, Germany, Netherland. And the bar chart illustrates the five reasons for using car in Canada supported by a survey.
From an overall perspective, people tends to chose Car as their taveling transporations among these countries, while people will consider bicylcle or root as their first choice in particular countries, and the remaining tavel transportations saw a negligible percentage. We can also see that people have the disproportionatly requirements for using car in Canda.
According to the table, Car account for the majority proportion of journey transportations among four countries, to be precise, all are over 45 percent overall. Subsequently, Public transport take up 12 and 18 percent in Belgium and Germany perspectively, which figures are similar when compared with travel on foot. In addition to that, chosing bicycle or other transportions are minority, all are under 3 percent, excepting of Netherland, which around 26 percent people prefer bicycle.
Looking at the car use bar chart, approximately 40 percent people using car because there do not have ant alternative, and need for work making it the second largest category with a figure of 30 percent. Following that, car using in convenient is a little bit less than commuting for work. Additionally, using car due to quicker speed take up 12 percent approximately, while work nightshift constituted the lowest porprotion, merely less than 10 percent.
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries 73
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nations statistics 73
- The table shows the percentage of journeys made by different forms of transport in four countries The bar chart shows the results of a survey into car use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 78
- Consumption of meat The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...wing that, car using in convenient is a little bit less than commuting for work. Additiona...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, so, while, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44957983193 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27010897972 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 106.607317073 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655462184874 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4537418365 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.7 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146046853184 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668836522039 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451761327062 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951689005257 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390983590923 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...wing that, car using in convenient is a little bit less than commuting for work. Additiona...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, so, while, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44957983193 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27010897972 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 106.607317073 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655462184874 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4537418365 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.7 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146046853184 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668836522039 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451761327062 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951689005257 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390983590923 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.