This table shows the percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table compares two age groups in terms of their proportions of boys playing 5 distinct sports in the UK in 2010.
Overall, it is evident that football was the most popular discipline in both groups. In addition, boys in younger groups tended to be more active than the older counterparts, reflected by their higher percentages of participants in most sports.
Turning into detail, in comparison to the rates of footballer in 6-11 group, which reached 87%, the figure for 12-16 group was remarkably lower, with 78%. Likewise, basketball participants accounted for 35% of total boys aging from 6 to 11 years old, while it occupied exactly one fourth in the remaining category. Also, boys taking part in cricket of 6-11-year-old group was significantly higher than those of 12-16 group, which were 45% and 34%, respectively.
Regarding to other sports, considerable differences were not witnessed. Indeed, in younger group, 23% of total population played rugby, which was slightly higher than a twenty-one-per-cent proportion in the older item. Meanwhile, swimming was the only sports observing equal rates of competitors in both groups, with 19%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-24 | phuong cao | 78 | view |
- Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup, and that the money would be better spent on other things. However, others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear, positive impact on 89
- Some people believe that sports should be a compulsory at school while others believe that it should optional Discuss both sides 92
- The graph show the progress of milk production.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 – 2010.Summarise the main character and make comparison where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, regarding, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33695652174 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04091506972 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657608695652 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8573208053 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.111111111 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184755204057 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772331205964 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747936158694 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127155440742 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847054887278 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.