The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words.

Essay topics:

The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.

The table illustrated the proportion of students attending secondary school between 2000 and 2009. The tables dispatch the category of four different schools also.
The information shows, specialist schools and community schools have 12 % of pupil attendance in 2000. Mean while, the percentage of voluntary controlled schools has significantly high which was 52% over the same period of time. Due to some reason the numbers of child has decreased in voluntary controlled schools at 2005 and 2009 where 38 % and 20% respectively.
On the other hand the attendance of grammar schools was quite remarkable in 2000 but this figure has been decline from 2005 and only 12% at 2009. Comparing to others the community schools presents has incredible where they have only 12% of attendance in 2000, science then the numbers has dramatically increased and rose to 58% till the end of 2009. Likewise, Specialist schools have remained almost same percentages of presents over the decade.
As a conclusion we can say that the attraction on community schools has been increased over the past decade. However the attendance of pupils over different schools has satisfactory level.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-27 Rizvi007 84 view
2019-09-21 rose_3012 78 view
2019-09-21 MaKay1990 73 view
2019-08-21 harshiniharshini 84 view
2019-08-21 harshiniharshini 61 view
Essays by user Ketan Raj Poudel :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... the category of four different schools also. The information shows, specialist sch...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tegory of four different schools also. The information shows, specialist schools a...
^^^
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: MEAN_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meanwhile'?
Suggestion: Meanwhile
... have 12 % of pupil attendance in 2000. Mean while, the percentage of voluntary controlled...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...cantly high which was 52% over the same period of time. Due to some reason the numbers of chil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty schools presents has incredible where they have only 12% of attendance in 2000...
^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ercentages of presents over the decade. As a conclusion we can say that the attrac...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...as been increased over the past decade. However the attendance of pupils over different...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fferent schools has satisfactory level.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, second, so, then, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30107526882 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84633618828 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5799148482 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255886147273 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120653963469 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980833291164 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178119268024 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095181614902 0.0819641961636 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.