The table gives information about the figure of people who engage in sightseeing and the expenditure of tourists in five nations in two separate years.
On the whole, as can be seen in the table, France had the largest number of tourists in both 2012 and 2013, whereas Italy had the least tourist number in both given years. Moreover, USA witnessed the biggest figure in terms of tourists spending in 2012 and 2013. On the contrary, tourists in Italy spent had the lowest expenditure compared to other four countries in 2012 and 2013.
Turning to detail, France is the most visited countries of the whole, having totally 83 and 84.7 million visitors in 2012 and 2013, respectively. By the same token, the number of tourists in Italy is the lowest among the five different countries, attracting merely 46.4 and roughly 48 million tourists from 2012 to 2013. Furthermore, United States earned the largest amount of income from tourists, receiving approximately 126 billion in 2012 and 140 billion in 2013.
Last but equally important, the most striking point is the country Spain experienced the most significant growth in the tourists number, increasing by 3.2 million from 2012 to 2013. In addition, China is the only country that underwent a decline in the figure of tourists, diminishing from 57.7 million in 2012 to 55.7 million in 2013.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, whereas, in addition, on the contrary, on the whole, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00888888889 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61564523588 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506666666667 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0883328719 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.222222222 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326450895043 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149147525404 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570571732825 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199507270354 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484815934907 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.