The information about the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five different nations is depicted by the rendered two tables. The data has been calibrated in millions of euros.
To begin with, in 1999, 1.5 and 3 million euros sales of coffee were in the UK and Switzerland. However, there had been drastic increase noticed in 2004 for these countries, it was increased by 18.5 and 3 correspondingly. Moreover, in Denmark and Sweden, there were 0.2 million euros of the positive difference between 1999 and 2004. 1 million euros sales of coffee were in Belgium, in 1999. After 5 years, it was increased by 0.7.
Moving towards, a dramatic increase was seen in the sale of bananas in Switzerland in 2004, it comprised to 47 million of euros. Sweden and Denmark is the only country where the sales of banana were decreased, which were decreased by 0.8 and 0.1 respectively. Whereas, there was a rapid increase observed in the sales of bananas in the UK and Belgium, which were 5.5 and 4 in 2004 respectively.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the sales of coffee were increased in all five European countries throughout the span.
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 56
- the diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 56
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively larger number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, whereas, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80295566502 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89613280708 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9795889647 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326585997054 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14360336602 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125274862631 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226862893302 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100331055376 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.