The graph shows the proportion of people who were born in the UK, Asia and other regions resident in Australia over a 35-year period.
Overall, the percentage of those originally from the UK fell over the period, while the proportion of people of Asian origin rose sharply.
In 1976, about 14% of the Australian population were born in the UK, compared with 12% from other regions and 3% from Asia. The figure for those born in the UK declined steadily to 5% in 2011. In contrast, the percentage of those born in Asia increased significantly to reach 15% by the end of the period. The proportion of Australian residents from other regions fluctuated, falling to a low point of 8% in 1986. There was then a steady increase to 14% in 2006, with a slight fall in 2011.
The graph also shows the combined figures for people born in the UK, Asia and other regions, as a percentage of the total Australian population. In 1976 this stood at around 23%, falling to 21% in 2001 and then increasing to form one quarter of the Australian population in 2011.
- Most university graduates earn more money than less well educated people Some people argue that this means they should pay the full cost of their education To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA 67
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 73
- Some human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem while others think effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give your opinio 73
- Task 1 The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 67
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59574468085 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59957861265 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489361702128 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6515106768 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34048513629 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148820586174 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13107075286 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227695169452 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120082247326 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59574468085 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59957861265 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489361702128 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6515106768 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34048513629 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148820586174 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13107075286 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227695169452 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120082247326 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.