The given pie charts compare the percentage of expenses spent by the local authorities annually in Someland in three separate years, 1980, 1990, and 2000.
On the whole, Someland saw upward trend in terms of the spending on higher education, environmental services, and transportation. On the contrary, the downward trend could be observed in the expenditure on K-12 education, health and human resources, and other.
For the particulars, the "lion shares" of the expenditure was indicated in the higher education in 1980, 1990, and 2000, accounting for 35%, 45%, and 40%, respectively. Likewise, the proportion of spending on K-12 education comprised of one-fourth in 1980, then it declined to 20% in 1990, and hit a rock bottom at 18% by the year 2000.
The most striking point is the identical statistics in the year 1990. The percentage of budget in terms of the K-12 education was on par with that of the health and human resources, making up 20%. Moreover, the most notable growth fell into the category of the transportation, with 16% in 1980 and 22% in 2000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, moreover, so, then, on the contrary, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06703910615 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01207996214 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54748603352 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9990234226 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209501341611 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870962902489 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973937786592 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139365116262 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11514462132 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.