The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chart illustrates the percentage of yearly expenditure (in terms of staff salaries, resources, furnitures and insurance) conducted by a certain educational institution in the UK in 1981 1991 and 2001.

Overall, money expended on teachers wages was dramatically higher than other spendings in the three different years. In contrast the school finance was least channeled into insurance. In addition, furniture and equipment budget for 1991 was on the decrease.

In terms of paying lecturers, it was 40% in 1981, this increased considerably to 50% in 1991 with a slight drop 10 years later. The non-teaching faculty members experienced 28% expenses in 1981 with a little fall in 1991 (15%).

Pertaining to finance released for book and other materials possessed 15% of the money expended in 1981, this steadily increased to 20% and finally coming to a notable plunge in 2001 (9%). Furthermore, furniture spending took a different trend from 15% to a significant reduction to 5% and drastically rising to 23% in 2001. Lastly the college did not place much importance on insurance as it was 2% and 3% (in 1981 and 1991 respectively) and slightly rising to 8% in 2001.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ndings in the three different years. In contrast the school finance was least channeled ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...budget for 1991 was on the decrease. In terms of paying lecturers, it was 40% i...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, lastly, so, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07772020725 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99131157041 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60621761658 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4672163884 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.888888889 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167508473346 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672175092301 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360974233293 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103029522492 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035180462711 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.