The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by Arwinder on Fri, 10/26/2018 - 04:13

The pie charts depict variations in yearly consumption of money by the school in United Kingdom in three distinct years. The data is calibrated in proportion.

Overall, the most of money spent for the wages of educator and workers as compared to the other given data

It is clear that the highest percentage was seen in teachers' salaries that was exactly a half in 1991, Whereas in 2001 and 1981 it was nigh on half of proportion. The money that used for payment of other workers (peons and sweepers) in first year it was up to the quarter, whilst it was 22% in 1991 then it decreased by 3% in 2001.

However, the school utilized money on furniture and equipment in 2001 it was 23% but in 1981 and 1991 it was low that was 15% and 5% respectively. In contrast, for stationery purposes only the one of fifth money utilized for stationery resources in later years the consumption of money was in small minority of proportion. Eventually, for the insurance the total average oft three years was accounted for only 13% which was seen minimum than other resources.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...kers as compared to the other given data It is clear that the highest percentage ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...percentage was seen in teachers salaries that was exactly a half in 1991, Whereas...
^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pment in 2001 it was 23% but in 1981 and 1991 it was low that was 15% and 5% res...
^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 1981 and 1991 it was low that was 15% and 5% respectively. In contrast, for st...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, whereas, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65608465608 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59423336483 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.6303812177 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.714285714 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0855353008087 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495588138182 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453243601918 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591141812554 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412032079638 0.0819641961636 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.