The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system.
According to the figures provided, the line graph reveals how many males and females were convicted at various ages expressed as percentages and the pie chart illustrates the proportions of prisoners in both genders in the UK.
It is obvious that the number of convicted criminals reached an all-time high during the adolescence in both sexes and more guilty verdicts were delivered for male criminals than female ones regardless of age. Moreover, a marked contrast between the number of male prisoners and that of female offenders can be easily seen from the pie chart.
Both the male and the female conviction rates began rising at the age of 10 with 2 and 0 percent respectively, climbed significantly during the puberty, rocketed to the peaks of 16 and 5 percent by the age of 20, and then went down constantly to the original 2 and 0 percent when 60-year old. Males proven guilty were undoubtedly higher than females proven so over the whole range; however, the gap widened the most roughly by 11 percent when offenders were in their early twenties and gradually narrowed down back with a 2-percent discrepancy at 60.
Men who were confined in jail accounts for 96 percent of prison population while only 4 percent of that is female. It can surprisingly be seen that there is a disproportion between the percentage difference of male/female convictions and that of male/female inmate turnover.
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 84
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 78
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. 61
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 75
- The graph beside shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83831382177 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587234042553 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.1248304534 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.857142857 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5714285714 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270762370051 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133237557937 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655018981908 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181225511115 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571303506752 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 61.2550243902 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.