The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps shows the changes happend to an island after it made a tourist location
Overall, new buildings, tourist cottages , roads and foot paths build in order to attract tourists, while the no trees were cut down during these developments.

In the first map there is absolutely nothing in the graph except some trees and a beach.

However, after island became a tourist location an overall changes can be seen, firstly a restaurant and reception counter were built at the middle of the island. Secondly, a small port for the tourist boats constructed in to the sea.A road is there, which connecting restaurant,reception and pier. Cottages for tourists, can be seen at the both sides of the restaurant and reception and foot paths linked each cottages to the other in a circle.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sland after it made a tourist location Overall, new buildings, tourist cottages...
^^
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...Overall, new buildings, tourist cottages , roads and foot paths build in order to ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cut down during these developments. In the first map there is absolutely not...
^^
Line 6, column 236, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...tourist boats constructed in to the sea.A road is there, which connecting restaur...
^
Line 6, column 280, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , reception
...ad is there, which connecting restaurant,reception and pier. Cottages for tourists, can be...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 656.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 133.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93233082707 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.39596269041 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82803329761 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624060150376 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 190.8 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9253310052 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.2 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17312513103 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878885112201 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595896118491 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123970755559 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104672939599 0.0819641961636 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.