The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
These two maps depict road connections of the city hospital in 2 different years (2007 and 2010).
Firstly in 2007, there are a road ring around the hospital and some bus stops both sides of the Hospital Road.
After some development until 2010, road access of a city hospital is manipulated with some amenities. At the east side of the hospital, engineers have constructed a public parking lot, likewise bus station is built in the west side of the Hospital Rd. Furthermore, 2 roundabouts are constructed in junction of Hospital Road and Ring Road and Ring Road and Hospital Road.
To sum up, city hospital have developed in many factors in order to increase the accessibility of the hospital by providing some extra parkings and stations.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 61
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 35, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'rings'?
Suggestion: rings
...010. Firstly in 2007, there are a road ring around the hospital and some bus stops ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, likewise, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 616.0 965.302439024 64% => OK
No of words: 126.0 196.424390244 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.35036895883 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75281298673 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 71.0 106.607317073 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563492063492 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 189.9 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6943583321 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.2 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 5.23603664747 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266663922911 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175652957285 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647421526032 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191729533161 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661833249982 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.