The given circular charts highlight the information about the household expenditures on six distinct factors by a nation during the years: 1950 and 2010. It is a clear and coherent representation.
Overall, it is evident that expending on each category had marginally increased except transportation as it was drastically decreased in the last year.
It can be seen that during the year 1950, people preferred to spend on housing however, this trend had been drastically declined in the year 2010 to only 22.0%. Moreover, in regards the percentage of food expenditure in the year 1950 was comparatively low than 2010. Furthermore, health care was the only category in which least amount of expense had been spent by the people.
As far as trend was concerned, education comprised of 6.6% in the first year and then, it had showed only a slight decrease of about a mere 6.6% to 6.5% in 2010. Likewise, in the year 1950, transportation consisted of 3.3% household expenditure which rose significantly to 14.0% 60 years later.
- 1. What are the benefits of living in big cities, as opposed to rural areas? What are the problems of rural areas and how can they be solved? 78
- 1. What are the benefits of living in big cities, as opposed to rural areas? What are the problems of rural areas and how can they be solved? 78
- 1. What are the benefits of living in big cities, as opposed to rural areas? What are the problems of rural areas and how can they be solved? 78
- The Chart below show the males and females arrested over 5 years and the reasons for the most recent arrests 79
- The diagram below show how glass containers,such as bottles , are produced and recycled. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'which the least'.
Suggestion: which the least
...e, health care was the only category in which least amount of expense had been spent by the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04117647059 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03217463959 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0030837565 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.125 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18448583823 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830900460216 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798769918629 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116511896798 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774503126508 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.