The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.
The circular diagram reveal the information about the 5 different major energy resources utilised by USA during the year 1980 and 1990. The data is calibrated in per centum. It is clearly and coherently representated.
Looking at first diagram, in year 1980 the large proportion of oil used in USA, where as a tiny fraction consumed in nuclear power. As far as, roughly one quarter had been utilised in natural gas. After that, utilisation of coal and hydroelectric power 22% and 5% respectively.
Similarly, in second diagram, in year 1990 the highest statistical data in oil (35%), while as minimum contribution in nuclear power(10%). Besides, 25% data was running in natural gas. Furthermore, neither in coal nor be hydroelectric power data were noticed in 27% and 5%.
Overall it is evident that, a tiny fraction of hydroelectric power had been utilised in both years 1980 and 1990 in USA.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | Spring2019 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | tiendung00001 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Lia Bui | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Kamal1993 | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | green1222 | 78 | view |
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990. 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990. 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990. 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...he large proportion of oil used in USA, where as a tiny fraction consumed in nuclear pow...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, if, look, second, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 750.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03355704698 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95454506081 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61744966443 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8313362175 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.0 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0479287877016 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0173620840917 0.103423049105 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293168742443 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0357861828854 0.15604864568 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266891468338 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.