The given table illustrates the percentage of young employees in various employment
sectors in a particular country in 2005 and 2010. It is clear that some sectors became more
popular in 2010 and in some the percentage of employees reduced.
Agriculture and transport sector were the least popular in both 2005 and 2010, with only 5%
employed in each sector in 2005. However, in 2010, 8% were employed in agriculture, an
increase of 3%, whereas only 4% got jobs in transport, a decrease of 1% from the figure of
2005. In manufacturing and in shops, restaurants and hotels, almost equal proportion of
young people worked (21% and 20% respectively). But in 2010, the percentage fell to 14% in
manufacturing, whereas it rose to 32% in shops, restaurants and hotels, making it the most
sought after sector to work in 2010. Social services was the most popular area among the
young people in 2005, and almost a third (34%) worked in this sector, but this percentage
declined to 22% in 2010. In business and other sectors (not mentioned in the graph), almost
equal number worked in both the given years, with 7-8% working in 2005 and 10% each
working in 2010.
Overall, it is clear that transport, manufacturing and social services employed lesser number
of young people in 2010 as compared to 2005, whereas in all other departments, the
employment of youth increased.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of young employees in various employment sectors in a particular country in 2005 ...
^^^
Line 2, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is clear that some sectors became more popular in 2010 and in some the percenta...
^^^
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ular in both 2005 and 2010, with only 5% employed in each sector in 2005. However...
^^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...010, 8% were employed in agriculture, an increase of 3%, whereas only 4% got jobs...
^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and hotels, almost equal proportion of young people worked 21% and 20% respecti...
^^^
Line 8, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t in 2010, the percentage fell to 14% in manufacturing, whereas it rose to 32% in...
^^^
Line 9, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...staurants and hotels, making it the most sought after sector to work in 2010. Soc...
^^^
Line 10, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ices was the most popular area among the young people in 2005, and almost a third...
^^^
Line 11, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rked in this sector, but this percentage declined to 22% in 2010. In business and...
^^^
Line 12, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctors not mentioned in the graph, almost equal number worked in both the given ye...
^^^
Line 13, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., with 7-8% working in 2005 and 10% each working in 2010. Overall, it is clear t...
^^^
Line 15, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d social services employed lesser number of young people in 2010 as compared to 2...
^^^
Line 16, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...5, whereas in all other departments, the employment of youth increased.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97844827586 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74890192648 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474137931034 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6989005076 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 16.0 3.83414634146 417% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 1.69756097561 766% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0285593937559 0.215688989381 13% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0158244948881 0.103423049105 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.017569600203 0.0843802449381 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0118919176406 0.15604864568 8% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154502914829 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.