Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below.
The given line graph reveals what number of adults were doing smoking in Someland according to the report of university lecturer within four decades (from 1960 to 2000).
A quick glance at the line graph is quite enough to make it clear that women smoker's were soaring between 1960 and 2000. However, this trend was opposite for men.
In the analisation of the rates of smoking in Someland, in the initial year 1960, males were stood at number 600 in every thousand smoker's which was the top point in masculine smoker's. Over the period of four decades, this number was continuously going in the direction of ground and reached under half of the starting value in 2000.
In comparison, with males, in case of female smoker's, smoking pattern was completely unique, only hundred feminine were involved in every thousand smoker's in 1960 which became double after five years (in 1965) and showing stability upto 1970. Surprisingly, spectacular surgement was seen in the third quarter of 20s century in which it touched the highest number (300). Soon after this, women smoker's started going downside in slow pace and approached at 200 in the last year 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-03 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-11 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries. 73
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of jounal articles read per week by all students, phD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university. 61
- The chart below shows the proportion of males and females in Malaysia who commonly do physical activity in 2010 53
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992. 78
- The table below gives information about UK independent films. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90769230769 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35476770966 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610256410256 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7709720107 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.625 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0720592330699 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359111760754 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580279575529 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0628495491452 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719254130576 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.