The provided bar graph illustrates information on folks who ate five portion of fruit and vegetables per day consume in the report say that United kingdom used over the eight year.
Firstly, look at the bar graph in children in 2007 touched the highest point roughly one quarter than after 2006-2007 men performance is same consume the vegetables food around 28% after that women is hit the vertex in 2006 nearly third portion of circle cover in diet food. Secondly, whole nuclear family performance in amid 2001-2003 same level of eating fresh fruit. Thirdly, dramatically upsurge fresh vegetables food in among 2004-2006. Then after mildly change in last 2 year I. Kid, men and women. Last but not least, United kingdom more diet or fresh food eating in women then after inter-mediate level is men and in this era, more children spent on restaurant fast food eat and less importance given on vegetable food.
To conclusions, to begin year children, men and women five fruit is moderate different then last year 2008 tediously near and contract and more forward to deit side.
- The chart bellow shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 78
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. 56
- An rise number of folks are buying whatt they need online. What are the pros and cons for both individual and companies to shopping online. 53
- Financial education should be a mandatory component of the school program. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- It is difficult for people in the cities getting enough physical exercise. What are the causes and salutation? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vegetables'' or 'vegetable's'?
Suggestion: vegetables'; vegetable's
...007 men performance is same consume the vegetables food around 28% after that women is hit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vegetables'' or 'vegetable's'?
Suggestion: vegetables'; vegetable's
...it. Thirdly, dramatically upsurge fresh vegetables food in among 2004-2006. Then after mil...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... women five fruit is moderate different then last year 2008 tediously near and contr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, then, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95054945055 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46894123314 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620879120879 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.9086825654 43.030603864 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.