The maps demonstrated how a town changed since a hydroelectric power dam was erected between 1990 and 2010.
Overall, this town had undergone significant transformation from its more urban and agricultural past.
It was clearly seen that, in 1990, the river that ran from South to North cut the town in half. Forest and woodlands with some uncommon plants and animals could be found on the left bank of the river. Additionally, it possessed an ancient structure. Villages and irrigated farmlands were to its right, and mountains were at right angles to them.
The town had a drastically different appearance in 2010 following the completion of the dam. The river's course was divided in two, a lake was created to the north of the town, and a sizable hotel was constructed on the lake's right side. As forests were cut down, animals disappeared. The villages were moved to the southern end of the river. On both sides of the river, which were built to provide electricity to neighboring sites, important engineering works can also be observed.
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 78
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 61
- The pie chart give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992 78
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group 84
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngineering works can also be observed.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97159090909 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82577217378 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647727272727 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9702603282 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5454545455 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.81818181818 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110618187396 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403692606684 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580467335905 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869290101442 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686348995291 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.