The line graph provides information about the amount of CO2 per person emitted into the air in 4 different countries, namely the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal, on the average from 1967 to 2007. It is also worth noting that while Italian and Portuguese people were inclined to release an increasing amount of CO2 in that period, there was a reverse trend in those of the UK and Sweden.
To specify, after achieving almost 9 metric tonnes in 1967, the quantity of CO2 in Sweden reached a peak of approximately 10 metric tonnes, before falling steeply by about 5 metric tonnes in 2007. Furthermore, the period from 1967 to 2007 witnessed a slight decrease in the amount of CO2 released in the UK. Surprisingly, the quantity of CO2 which was emitted to the atmosphere in the UK was always higher than that of its counterparts in those years. In contrast, the year 1997 saw that figure for CO2 in Italy rise dramatically at almost 8 metric tonnes, followed by a plateau in that of Italy. Similarly, the year 1997 also witnessed a sharp rise in the quantity of CO2 emitted into Portuguese air, then that of greenhouse gas in Portugal leveled off at over 5 metric tonnes.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
- Economic progress is one way to measure a country’s success. What other factors do you think should be concerned when measuring the success of a country? In these factors, which one is the most important? 67
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers. 78
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, similarly, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 32.9175257732 30% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 26.3917525773 174% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 937.175257732 102% => OK
No of words: 207.0 206.0 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63768115942 4.54256449028 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65428055331 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 127.690721649 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 290.88556701 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.360824742268 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 16.3608247423 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.779664636 44.8134815571 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.142857143 76.5299724578 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 16.8248392259 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 4.34317383033 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.29896907216 47% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162226754821 0.216113520407 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813530594251 0.0766984524023 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711284667309 0.0603063233224 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144937477058 0.12726935374 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455514193324 0.0580467560999 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 8.37731958763 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 70.7449484536 71% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 7.45979381443 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 8.71597938144 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 7.59969072165 115% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 41.2886597938 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 8.62886597938 203% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 8.54432989691 159% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.