The line graph illustrates the amount of carbon dioxide metric tonnes, which were produced per individual in 4 countries from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it is immediately clear that there were upward trends in the quantity of Co2 emissions in Portugal and in Italy, while these figure of those in two remainders went down significantly over this period time.
The year 1967 experienced a far difference from the amount of Co2 emissions of 4 countries. Those of Uk was the highest, which stood at nearly 11 merit tonnes, following the second, the third and the final rank belonged to Sweden, Italy and Portugal, which were different in their figure, about 9 tonnes, 4 tonnes and 1 tonnes respectively. Over a decade, that of Co2 tonnes, produced per person in UK registered almost no change, meanwhile the remainders witnessed similar trends, increasing rapidly by average 2 tonnes in every nation.
Obviously in the 40 years from 1977 to 2007 per civil of Uk and Sweden created CO2 metric tonnes, which decreased sharply, reaching their nadirs( roughly 9 and 5 tonnes). On the contrary, In Italy and Portugal continued to pick up nearly 8 and 5 tonnes. In conclusion, in 2007 the top of the quantity of Co2 emissions was apparent in Uk, furthermore, Sweden and Portugal were jointly the lowest.
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 41
- THE GRAPH SHOWS THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATES IN THE US AND JAPAN BETWEEN MARCH 1993 AND MARCH 1999. 84
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000. 84
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 78
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n and Portugal were jointly the lowest.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, so, third, while, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 32.9175257732 27% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 937.175257732 115% => OK
No of words: 219.0 206.0 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92237442922 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73958903767 2.54303337028 108% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 127.690721649 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575342465753 0.622605031667 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 290.88556701 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 16.3608247423 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.3908023015 44.8134815571 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.75 76.5299724578 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 16.8248392259 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 4.34317383033 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190217930967 0.216113520407 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093045550163 0.0766984524023 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391044030153 0.0603063233224 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121527246831 0.12726935374 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407507925169 0.0580467560999 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 8.37731958763 184% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 70.7449484536 74% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 7.45979381443 169% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 8.71597938144 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 41.2886597938 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 8.54432989691 150% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.