The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given line graph illustrates information of per person carbon dioxide emission in four different nations from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, an upward trend was observed in Italy and Portugal with moderate upsurge; while UK witnessed a downward tendency at the end of 4 decades of timeline. Moreover, Portugal accounted for all time lowest scale throughout entire time period.
Regarding the Italy and portugal, in 1967, both started by about 1.2 and 4.2 metric tonnes production of CO2 respectively. Following them, with a minimal rise, Portugal reached at nearly 5.5 metric tonnes value. Again, similar trend was observed in the case of Italy by surpassing Sweden in 1987 at about 7 metric tonnes and ending with just near 7.9 metric tonnes.
At beginning, UK stood at close to 11 metric tonnes. After a 40 years of time, just more than 2 tonnes of decline was noticed with the proportion of 8.8 metric tonnes. After a peak of 10.2 metric tonnes in 1977, Sweden started falling and setteled at near 5.8 metric tonnes when finished.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'time the lowest'.
Suggestion: time the lowest
...e. Moreover, Portugal accounted for all time lowest scale throughout entire time period. R...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tonnes'' or 'tonne's'?
Suggestion: tonnes'; tonne's
...oth started by about 1.2 and 4.2 metric tonnes production of CO2 respectively. Followi...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c tonnes. After a 40 years of time, just more than 2 tonnes of decline was notice...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 32.9175257732 3% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 937.175257732 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 206.0 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94252873563 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51035640602 2.54303337028 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 127.690721649 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632183908046 0.622605031667 102% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 290.88556701 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7700068199 44.8134815571 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5555555556 76.5299724578 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 16.8248392259 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 4.34317383033 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119796703335 0.216113520407 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589815105833 0.0766984524023 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809641848933 0.0603063233224 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102807939675 0.12726935374 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102438859614 0.0580467560999 176% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 8.37731958763 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 70.7449484536 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 8.71597938144 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 41.2886597938 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.