The line graph illustrates the percentage of visitors who visited to four different places in Scotland (Aquarium, castle, zoo, festival) between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, there was a moderate fall in the percentage of tourist visited aquarium and festival through the period. On the other hand, the percentage of peoples who visited castle and zoo was increase gradually and at the end of the period.
In the beginning of the period, the percentage of foreigners visited castle was over 20%. While, the percentage of visitors who visited zoo was nearly 10%. From 1980 to 2010, there was a fluctuation in the percentage of tourist visited zoo between 10% and 15%. Especially, in the end of the period, the percentage of peoples visited castle increased gradually and became the most popular attraction in 2010.
From 1980 to 1990, the percentage of foreigners visits aquarium was a significant oscillation, but from 1990 on wards, it decreased rapidly and became the lowest at the end the period. On the other hand, in 1980, festival was the most popular place with the highest percentage of visitors (Over 30%). However, the percentage of tourists visited festival was slightly decline over the period.
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 15 78
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2050 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 61
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years 78
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...foreigners visited castle was over 20%. While, the percentage of visitors who visited...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 365, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'declined'.
Suggestion: declined
... tourists visited festival was slightly decline over the period.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 32.9175257732 3% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 937.175257732 108% => OK
No of words: 197.0 206.0 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11675126904 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69436536699 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 127.690721649 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416243654822 0.622605031667 67% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 290.88556701 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7261026506 44.8134815571 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8 76.5299724578 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 16.8248392259 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 4.34317383033 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185612158977 0.216113520407 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102150984121 0.0766984524023 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055701489352 0.0603063233224 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151374907454 0.12726935374 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606135431573 0.0580467560999 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 8.37731958763 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 70.7449484536 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 8.71597938144 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 7.59969072165 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 41.2886597938 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.