The graphs illustrate the budget of the police and how it was spent from 2017 to 2018.
Overall, the police budget had increased during this period, and the staff salaries had a slight decrease in 2018 while the money allocated into technology had increased noticeably.
On the table chart, police received their budget from national government around 175.5 milion in 2017. This figures had a slight increase in 2018 from 175.5 milion to 177.8 milion in 2018. The police had also received funding from local taxes in 2017 with 91.2 milion and had a noticeable increase in 2018 with 102.3 milion. Other sources such as grants had also experienced a slight increase from 38 milion in 2017 to 38.5 milion. The total that the police had received in 2017 was around 304.7 milion and this number had increased to 318.6 milion in 2018.
On the pie chart, the money was spent mostly in salaries of officers and staff with 75 percent of the budget was allocated towards in. This figures had decreased slightly in 2018 to 69 percent. Technology had experienced a sharp increase from 8 percent in 2017 to 14 percent in 2018 while the money spent on buildings and transport remained the same in both years with 17 percent respectively.
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 73
- An airport map s redevelopment in the next year 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 56
- In their advertising business nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 26.3917525773 155% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 937.175257732 109% => OK
No of words: 212.0 206.0 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79716981132 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39371339775 2.54303337028 94% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 127.690721649 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433962264151 0.622605031667 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 290.88556701 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.4015700185 44.8134815571 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.7 76.5299724578 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 16.8248392259 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 4.34317383033 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199767675708 0.216113520407 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11482352789 0.0766984524023 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803737598563 0.0603063233224 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155028397042 0.12726935374 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071543044072 0.0580467560999 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 8.37731958763 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 70.7449484536 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 7.45979381443 106% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 8.71597938144 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 7.59969072165 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 41.2886597938 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.