It is argued that, in recent years, many people think that governments should make citizens hold accountable for environmental protection. In my opinion, this approach would be very shortsighted view following
On the one hand, it cannot be denied that the main cause of environmental pollution is the rapid development of the industry which is disposed a huge amount of gas emissions into the atmosphere. As a result, these problems are too intricate and serious for individuals in the country to be tackled. Therefore, governments should play a vital role in order to minimize it. Besides, if governments can control these problems greatly, the environmental issues will be resolved quickly.
On the other hand, some may argue that the contribution of residents is also a necessary factor, this argument may be true to some extent. Admittedly, each of people should be a significant role to protect the environment by some simple actions such as plant more trees, do not use anything that makes from plastics. Furthermore, transportation is one of the causes of releasing carbon dioxide. Consequently, the contamination of the ozone layer will become more serious. In that case, individuals need to change their own travel habits. To illustrate, in Japan, most of citizens are all prefer to use environmentally friendly transports and this makes the environment improved significantly. This example also indicates that people's attitudes towards protecting the environment cannot be underestimated.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that making people be responsible for their own local environment is very crucial. However, I truly believe that this solution needs the combination of both goverments and the people
- In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people believe that becoming a vegetarian is the only way to keep healthy Do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays children are experiencing increased educational social and commercial pressure What are the reasons for this What is a solution to reduce the pressure 73
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in 3 capital cities in 1980 2010 Summarize the information and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the citizens') or simply say ''most citizens''.
Suggestion: most of the citizens; most citizens
...travel habits. To illustrate, in Japan, most of citizens are all prefer to use environmentally f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39405204461 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20479733268 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613382899628 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9814391995 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.642857143 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190097724796 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672478670609 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736138905759 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130188388344 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05395028201 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.