Killing animals for the sake of fun has become a controversial issue nowadays. As blood sports involve shedding blood of the innocent animals, it is highly unethical and violation of the animal rights. In my opinion, all blood sports like, bullfighting, hunting, cockfighting should be forbidden.
The main reason for the prevention of blood sports is that it is highly regarded as cruelty rather than a sport. It is extremely immoral for humans to kill animals for their play and showing up their power. For specimen, an earl along with his companions killed 72 buffaloes ate one and 71 were left to be rotten. In short, the damned humans kill the animal for their fun; the government should make laws and give sentence for this brutality and unkindness toward beasts.
A secondary reason for the prohibition against blood sports is that all creatures have the right to live freely without harassment. This world belongs to all human, animals, plants. It is extremely immoral to use animals for enjoyment and gaining money. For instance, in most of these competitions animals get injured and finally died because of the negligence of humans. It breaks the animal protection act. Therefore, blood sports should be banned.
Without any tinge of doubt, I can assert that animals are as precious as humans and we should stop all blood sports to make the world eco-friendly. Killing animals or shedding their blood for entertainment and getting money should be banned by laws and punishments because animals are also part of our ecosystem.
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as south pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons 67
- Most modern families have both parents working and as a result children spend less and less time with their parents.What is the reason for this?What problems can this cause? 70
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Individual can do nothing to help improve the environment; only government and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, second, so, therefore, for instance, in short, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67373917941 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560784313725 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1870726984 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369017136927 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140501059521 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749723794451 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252133102006 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288907376706 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.